Bar Chart Sample

The given bar chart compares four different cities in terms of the varied methods they use to dispose their waste. Looking at the information in more detail, landfill and incineration are the most common ways are used throughout the four cities. On the contrary, as per the chart, the method which is used less than other ways is compositing. Toronto, dispose approximately75% of its waste through landfill method. This figure is nearly 7times as high as that for the second highest used method. In Madrid, the percentage of incineration using is the highest at 40%. By contrast, under 10% of garbage is disposed through compositing. Waste recycling is used to dispose of approximately 23% of the garbage in Kuala Lumpur and Madrid. Kuala lumour uses the incineration for disposing more than 50% of its waste, On the other hand, like other cities, compositing is the less common way to dispose the garbage in this city. In Amman, the figures for the percentages of landfill and incineration are stood at roughly 48% and 38%, respectively.

The provide bar chart makes a comparison among four cities in term of methods utilized by each country in waste disposal. Overall, landfilling and incinerating refuse are the two most popular way, while compositing waste material the least used way. Toronto landfills nearly three quarters of its lettering; on the contrary, Kuala Lumpur deploys this way for under a quarter of its generated waste. Madrid and Amman use the same method for under a half and a third of the whole rubbish, respectively. As far as incinerating, the other way of disposing waste is concerned, Kuala Lumpur with incinerating more than a half of created rubbish is top position in this way; simultaneously, the percentage for Amman and Madrid come in at about 40%. The results for Kuala Lumpur and Madrid were a tie in recycling littering at about one fifth of the whole rubbish, while the same way is used by Torrent and Amman for 10% and under. Composing the waste is the least popular way for all countries involved in this survey, with under 10% of sequential wastage.

The provided bar chart indicates the proportion of using four diverse approaches related to waste materials in four cities. The investigated methods are including landfill, incineration, recycling, and compositing. As is observed, there is no overall pattern of the percentages of the utilized various methods in mentioned different cities.

The provided bar chart indicates the proportion of using four diverse approaches related to waste materials in four cities. The investigated methods are including landfill, incineration, recycling, and compositing. As is observed, there is no overall pattern of the percentages of the utilized various methods in mentioned different cities.

The bar chart depicts information on varying waste disposal methods used in Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. In common, According to the presentation, Incineration and Landfill are the two significant and two most popular waste disposal methods in all of these cities.

3. The chart gives information the number of different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.. As is observed, landfill and incineration are the most common ways are used throughout the four cities are the most common ways are used throughout the four cities

the provided bar chart shows data about the different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. According to the chart, Toronto has the highest waste disposal rate among these four cities, which dispose of about 64% of waste.

the supplied bar graph gives data on the number of different methods of of waste disposal in four cities namely Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.

The provided bar chart figures the different methods of waste disposal in Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.

As bar graph shows, the highest statistics of landfills are related to Toronto, As expected, this country has the lowest recycling statistics. IN terms of burning, Kuala Lumpur ranks first and Toronto ranks last. Madrid and Kuala Lumpur have the most recycling with equal statistics. In all four countries, composting rates are lower than other methods of waste disposal.

The provided bar chart depicts varying waste disposal methods in four countries, Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, Amman.

the showed chart compares the waste disposal methods in Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.

the given chart shows data about the proportion of varying waste disposal methods used in Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman.

the supplied chart gives information on different waste disposal methods use in 4 cities:toronto,kuala lumpur,madris and amman.

As is presented, Madrid and Kuala Lumpur incinerate most of their scraps but Toronto and Amman use the landfill method to get rid of their waste materials.

The given chart demonstrates data on varying methods in terms of waste disposal in Madrid, Toronto, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. Overall, it is clear that there are four different methods, which are using for wasting disposal, including Landfill, Incineration, recycling, and compositing. At one glance, while landfill in Toronto makes up the highest proportion, the least important method is compositing in Amman. In terms of Toronto, and Amman, the landfill in Toronto has accounted for the biggest percentage around 75%, however in Kuala Lumpur incineration is responsible for a total of wasting approximately just above half, and the landfill comprises a small minority. In addition, compositing is the same for both of them and represents just under a one-tenth. Turning to the rest of the bar chart, the figure for recycling in Madrid turned nearly twice as much as in Amman. On the other hand, the landfill in Amman is experienced just under a half, but in Madrid, it is 28%.

At a glance, landfill and incineration are the most common methods are used throughout the four countries. on the contrary, the method which is used less than other is compositing. As per the bar chart, Toronto and Amman are liable for disposing of more than half of the waste through landfilling.

the given bar chart compares the varied methods that is used due to dispose their waste in four cities such as Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. obviously, in Toronto landfilling is more common than other methods which allocated approximately 75% to itself.in Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman incineration's percentage is about 45to 50% while the others methods are lesser. recycling, is the same in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur are about 22%.out of all, the least used method for waste disposal is Compositing and it is used only for 2-8% of the total waste in all of the cities.

Overall, the two most popular ways to refuse waste among these countriies are landfilling and incinerating. Toronto landfills nearly 75 percent of its waste while Amman and Madrid have second and third place respectively. Kuala Lumpur uses this way for only a quarter of its generation whereas incinerating is so common in this city. The order of incineration among these cities is Kuala Lumpur, Madrid, Amman and Toronto. Recycling and compositing are two other ways of refusing waste which are deployed the least in these cities.

Overall, the two most popular ways to refuse waste among these countriies are landfilling and incinerating. Toronto landfills nearly 75 percent of its waste while Amman and Madrid have second and third place respectively. Kuala Lumpur uses this way for only a quarter of its generation whereas incinerating is so common in this city. The order of incineration among these cities is Kuala Lumpur, Madrid, Amman and Toronto. Recycling and compositing are two other ways of refusing waste which are deployed the least in these cities.

Overall, the two most popular ways to refuse waste among these countriies are landfilling and incinerating. Toronto landfills nearly 75 percent of its waste while Amman and Madrid have second and third place respectively. Kuala Lumpur uses this way for only a quarter of its generation whereas incinerating is so common in this city. The order of incineration among these cities is Kuala Lumpur, Madrid, Amman and Toronto. Recycling and compositing are two other ways of refusing waste which are deployed the least in these cities.