Paraphrase: Illustrate the comparison of conferences between 1980 and 2010 in 3 cities.
Overview/summary paragraph: (1) contrast rapid increase in the figures for City C (2) the number of conferences declined in Cities A and B.
Paragraph 3: City A and City B: compare 1980 numbers; give figures for 2005, when both cities hosted the same number of international conferences; compare final numbers in 2010.
Paragraph 4: contrast City c trend and numbers; giving figures for 1980,1990, 2000, and 2010; 3 cities faced a downward trend.
The line graph illustrates the comparison of the international conferences conducted in three different capital cities from 1980 through 2010.
We can observe that over the years, the number of international conferences in City C witnessed a massive increase until 2000, while the number of such conferences in cities A and B gradually dropped.
Initially, in the year 1980, City A organized 35 and City B hosted 30 International conferences, respectively. However, there were several differences in hosting the conferences between cities A and B until 2005. In 2005, an equal number of conferences, around 27, were conducted in both cities. Interestingly, by the end of the year 2010, City B increased its international conferences to 26 and took over city A which conducted only 24 conferences.
There was no conference held in City C in 1980. Between 1981 and 1990, the number of conferences rose substantially from 0 to 20 in City C, which kept increasing till 25 in 1995. Thereafter, city C hosted many conferences. In contrast, there were hardly any conferences in cities A and B, which led to some fluctuations. The figures in city C peaked at 35 in 2000. However, by the end of the period, all three cities followed a downward trend.
The information about the international conferences in three capital cities over a thirty year period, is illustrated in the given line graph. Overall, while the number of conferences which were conducted in city A and B had a downward trend, the figure for city C seems to have had a rapid increase during the period. In 1980, as it can be seen clearly, city C witnessed no conference, however, in city A and B, respectively, 35 and 30 conferences held. Over the first ten years, while city C experienced a rapid increase, reaching at 20 conferences in 1990, the figure for city A and B fluctuated. Over the second three years, the number of conferences which were held in city A and B fell to the equal number of 25. In contrast, the increase was followed for city c before peaking at 35 in 2000. Over the third ten years, although the number of conference in city C had a downward trend, the figure for city A and B were lower and stood at almost 25.
The supplied line graph illustrates data about conferences which were held on three various cities between 1980 to 2010. The numbers for city C experienced an upward trend; whereas, there were some fluctuations in city A and B. As data suggest that in 1980 there was no conference held in city C. Thereafter, city C rose from a low of 0 to in 1980 to a peak in the 2000 . The figure of city C during 1995 had the same number of conferences with city A and B. In 2000, the number of conferences reached a peak of 35. In succeeding years, the figure for city C witnessed a slight drop until 2010 and made up 30 conferences. Patterns of city A and B had fluctuations over the mentioned period. City A organized 35 and city B hosted 30 conferences in 1980. In following years, both of them slightly fluctuated till 2005 which held the equal number of conferences approximately 27. By the end of the 2010, surprisingly city B took over city A which conducted only 24 conferences. In the end three cities had an downward tendency.
The supplied illustration depicts the information on three capital cities in 1980 – 2010 as is observed the figure of international conferences in City C climed until 2000, however the number of conferences plummeted in Cities A and B
the given illustration gives information on three capital cities in 1980-2010, surprisingly city B took over city A wich conducted only 24 confrences.
The mentioned figure gives data about the international conferences held between 1980 and 2010 in three huge cities.
Supplied figure shows data on international meetings of three mentioned cities in a 30-year period.
لطفا وارد شوید و نظر خود را ثبت نمایید.
نام | تعداد آزمون | میزان موفقیت | |
---|---|---|---|
َAmeneh Darvishzadeh | 1 | 100/00 % | |
Mehrad Hashemi | 1 | 100/00 % | |
Noushmehr Norsobhi | 1 | 100/00 % | |
محمدحسین میرزایی | 1 | 100/00 % | |
مهدی حسین پور آقائی | 1 | 100/00 % | |
Farnoush Toghiany | 21 | 98/36 % | |
zahra namdari | 46 | 98/21 % | |
یاسمن محمدی پور | 4 | 98/08 % | |
Tara Mohammadi | 3 | 96/43 % | |
yasaman mohamadipur | 51 | 95/86 % | |
مهدی هنرمند | 1 | 95/24 % | |
محمدجواد ملائی اردستانی | 3 | 94/44 % | |
Arzhang Saberi | 4 | 93/33 % | |
Soheila Karimi | 124 | 92/73 % | |
aram farhmand | 10 | 92/31 % | |
یاشار اسکندری | 98 | 91/14 % | |
عباس پورمیدانی | 1 | 90/00 % | |
پریسا سلوکی شهرضایی | 72 | 89/49 % | |
ارشیا قلمکاری | 33 | 89/23 % | |
Matin Azimipour | 30 | 88/17 % |