Parents often give children everything they ask for and do what they like. Is it good for children? What are the consequences when they grow up?
Indulging children has become a common parenting problem in many modern families. From my perspective, this practice may create some immediate adverse impacts on children and also results in long-term consequences for them.
In the short term, over-indulgence may cause some delay in the process of children learning important life skills. We can see this in a variety of age groups, ranging from toddlers to teenagers. For example, many over-caring parents spoon-feed their children until they are five or six, the developmental stage in which they should have already been able to eat independently. Also, there is a common practice in our country that parents assist their preadolescent children in taking a bath or a shower. As a result, children may fail to acquire basic personal hygiene skills at the right time.
In the long run, the consequences are even direr as over-indulged children grow up. If parents unconditionally satisfy all their children’s needs, they may inadvertently make their children over-reliant on other people. When these children enter adulthood, the inability to live independently can cause some difficulties for them to maintain their overall well-being; for instance, they may be unaware of what to do when they catch a fever. Furthermore, it is a norm that over-indulgent parents are lenient and do not require children to face the consequences of their misbehavior. In general, this deprives children of the opportunities to learn from mistakes, which may cause their problem-solving skills to be severely lacking in the future.
From the issues outlined above, one can conclude that over-indulgence may produce a number of unfavourable effects on children, including the delay in gaining crucial life skills such as self-feeding and the long-term consequence of lacking the ability to cope with problems as adults in the future.
Nowadays over indulging children by parents has become commonplace across the world. I hold a strong belief and I submit that it can have devastating effect on children's cognitive development, on the ground which I shall delve into it in this essay. To begin with, parents tend to indulge children's whim by providing them with things which are not necessarily in dire need of them. For instance, by spoon- feeding children makes them to have difficulty in reaching their cognitive milestones, in turn, when they reach adolescence they would be barely capable of eating independently. Moreover, in my country children rare being spoiled by getting a great deal of pocket money, so they draw a distorted impression of around world by getting money for granted and plentiful; accordingly, they could not keep themselves motivated to set aside money. Over-indulged children are prone to be vulnerable in their unforeseen life as they think these so-called affection go on forever; therefore, they could cope with adversities confront them as an insurmountable hindrance. What is more, they would be oppressed by society, consequently indulged children are more apt to be grinded down, as community would not fulfil their needs at the same manner as their indulgent parents. That is to say, pampered children find it hard to distance themselves from undue caring parents. In a research conducted by MIT university reveals that children who have grown up in indulgent family have constituted the majority share of unemployed person in the year of 2010. In conclusion, over-protective family not only are not conducive to children's upbringing, but can be counterproductive by spoiling their future.
لطفا وارد شوید و نظر خود را ثبت نمایید.
نام | تعداد آزمون | میزان موفقیت | |
---|---|---|---|
َAmeneh Darvishzadeh | 1 | 100/00 % | |
Mehrad Hashemi | 1 | 100/00 % | |
Noushmehr Norsobhi | 1 | 100/00 % | |
محمدحسین میرزایی | 1 | 100/00 % | |
مهدی حسین پور آقائی | 1 | 100/00 % | |
Farnoush Toghiany | 21 | 98/36 % | |
zahra namdari | 46 | 98/21 % | |
یاسمن محمدی پور | 4 | 98/08 % | |
Tara Mohammadi | 3 | 96/43 % | |
yasaman mohamadipur | 51 | 95/86 % | |
مهدی هنرمند | 1 | 95/24 % | |
محمدجواد ملائی اردستانی | 3 | 94/44 % | |
Arzhang Saberi | 4 | 93/33 % | |
Soheila Karimi | 124 | 92/73 % | |
aram farhmand | 10 | 92/31 % | |
یاشار اسکندری | 98 | 91/14 % | |
عباس پورمیدانی | 1 | 90/00 % | |
پریسا سلوکی شهرضایی | 72 | 89/49 % | |
ارشیا قلمکاری | 33 | 89/23 % | |
Matin Azimipour | 30 | 88/17 % |