IELTS Writing 2 Topic: Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history

Unfortunately, some individuals believe are numerous ancient buildings that are preserved by the government should be collapsed so that the new ones will replace. I've always taken the protection of the historic buildings for granted, however now, I should mention that it's vital because of the following reasons: first, the monuments illustrate the authenticity of a country. And secondly, these types of structures are the main capital to absorb tourists. To explain further, the existence of ancient buildings even as ruins can cause be proud individuals. And additionally, nowadays, there are plenty of modern buildings and residences in the world and the number can increase constantly. On the other hand, the increase rate of the number of the monument is steady. Therefore, unless the monuments and ancient buildings exist in a country, the main infrastructure of the tourist industry won't arise. So in conclusion, having every old architecture in a country is a fantastic opportunity that's worth protecting.

I have got positive mindset about old building or historical building I'd like to protect historical building.Historical building can be advantageous for areas from different perspectives You know ,first of all, financially speaking ,many tourists find them appealing and try to visit these old building .this is a golden opportunity for the locals to make as much money as possible, In the second place, culturally speaking,the benefit of being in contact with tourists from all walks of life from all over the world.This is a golden opportunity because it allows people to raise their awareness.Despite the fact that preserving historical building can cost these government an arm and a leg and they don't usually have sufficient money to devote to such things and also the people living in these areas are not aware of the real price, it is vital to take care of historical building.

First of all, Old manuments are reflection of a nation's culture and culture is an important factor for both personal and collective identity that is vital to distinguish a society from another one and therefore, preserving old buildings helps preserving past heritage and leads to identify culture and identity of a society. For instant, Iranian people refer their identity to cyrus the great. What shouldn’t scape unnoticed is that perspolis derelicts has been influential in this way of thinking and refering. That’s why I believe that old buildings shouldn’t be knok down. Secod of all, protection of old buildings is essential architecturally. Because they represent glorious past of a nation and could be the reservoir of inspiration for new constructions. That is, These new buildings that are combination of modernity and tradition create a sense of comfort and good vibes inside individuals. That’s why I persist on my belief that old buildings should be preserved. Last but not least is an economic reason. Old manuments in all countries are one of the most important source of tourists attraction. That is, they can make money for local people and lead to tourism that is counted one of the most sustainable way of earning money for both people and country and benefcial for government economy status. For example, numerous people all around the world come to egypt to visit egyptian pyramids. That’s why I totally disagree with replacing old manuments with new ones.

While some people opine old buildings must be demolished, some others believe the reverse. On the other hand they think these buildings should be preserved. I completely agree with the latter and in the following essay I shall delve into my reasons: First of all, Old manuments are reflection of a nation's culture and culture is an important factor for both personal and collective identity that is vital to distinguish a society from another one and therefore, preserving old buildings helps preserving past heritage and leads to identify culture and identity of a society. For instant, Iranian people refer their identity to cyrus the great. What shouldn’t scape unnoticed is that perspolis derelicts has been influential in this way of thinking and refering. That’s why I believe that old buildings shouldn’t be knok down. Secod of all, protection of old buildings is essential architecturally. Because they represent glorious past of a nation and could be the reservoir of inspiration for new constructions. That is, These new buildings that are combination of modernity and tradition create a sense of comfort and good vibes inside individuals. That’s why I persist on my belief that old buildings should be preserved. Last but not least is an economic reason. Old manuments in all countries are one of the most important source of tourists attraction. That is, they can make money for local people and lead to tourism that is counted one of the most sustainable way of earning money for both people and country and benefcial for government economy status. For example, numerous people all around the world come to egypt to visit egyptian pyramids. That’s why I totally disagree with replacing old manuments with new ones. In conclusion, old buildings are available sources shouldn’t be demolished as they are reflection of our glorious past and our collective identity and also new structures can be inspired by them. In addition they can attract tourists and earn money for people.

Many people and organizations believe that old buildings should be preserved, but others believe that we better demolish them.I admit that the first one is correct.in the following essay, I shall delve into my reasons. first of all, Ancient buildings are very important reservoir of the country's history.these buildings are very symbolic in terms of architecture and can be an example of the art of people who lived in the past, and contemporary architects can get ideas from them.civilization and culture can be found in these regarding people's lifestyles. Secondly, perservation of cultural heritage helps to attract tourists and improves the economic and living conditions of the people of the region. One of the ways to bring capital to the country is tourism and the ancient mounuments play a very important role in this. Old buildings, for example, include Salasel Castle, Sii o se pol, Falak Al-flak Castle and, etc... that's why we have to preserve the old buildings. In conclusion, It is important to preserve the old buildings to show symbols of the past people to future generations, and help the tourism industry and improve the economic conditions of the country.

A lot of ancient buildings and monuments are protected by the government. Although some groups of people believe that the New World is progressive and by destroying the historical building we can make a step to pushing forward, In my view this structure have an essential role in our country. This essay will give information about importance of maintaining ancient structure, which I shall explain more. The first reason refers to the imperative of maintaining of ancient buildings as the protection of country`s cultural heritage. This building have preserved by many people over the past centuries. The country can show it's historical value to the universe and also make them sure that this country has the power and absolutely tact, since it has old tribes that are known from their monuments. Second reason is about tourist attraction. Many tourist Who's interest in history, travel to various part of the world over the year. This issue can play an important role in the economic cycle of country. Indeed you can create the new job opportunities for young people. On the other hand may some tourist decide to stay in your country and this is a reason for genetic diversity. These are valid reasons for protecting these buildings while still using them for improvement In conclusion the maintenance of old house protect our cultural heritage and in It's own way, it will be the reason for development.

some people have the idea of demolishing old buildings protected by law, On the other hand others have different idea which is government should preserves these ancient buildings. I agree with Preserving these structures. due to it is crucial that, they represent a nation's rich history and cultural heritage, providing a tangible link to the past for future generations. Furthermore, historic buildings often contribute to the uniqueness and charm of a region, attracting tourists and generating economic benefits.

According to some people, old buildings should be demolished and replaced with modern buildings, on the contrary, some believe that they should be protected. Were I to single out, I would opt for preservation of old buildings. It is safe to say that ,the ancient houses are a symbol of the knowledge of the ancestors. It can be seen that in the old buildings of the Silk Hills city of Kashan, people used different ways to treat diseases. Archaeologists say that the first dental implants in the world can be seen in the remains of the Silk people, and the type of material used to make the implants was much more resistant because after thousands of years, the implants were still not damaged and discovered completely intact. This discovery shows that our ancestors had higher knowledge in the past. In addition, the existence of ancient buildings can contribute to the economy of any country. Every year, many people visit different historical monuments in the world and new job opportunities are created for young people. For example, selling handicrafts around ancient monuments is attractive to visitors and they buy handicrafts as gifts for their family and friends. Considering that tourists buy with dollars, it can be important for the local economy and business prosperity in historical areas. Finally, the old buildings of the city are more useful for people. From my perspective with proper planning, governments can make more use of old buildings and create new jobs. also, old buildings are valuable heritage and treasure of science and history of a nation that should be protected.

Ancient buildings are preserved by the government’s rules as a nation's history and their decision is exposed with some affirmatives and opponents. In my view, the historical building should be preserved and even renovated due to their importance. The most important reason is that the historical buildings are treasure troves and should remain unspoiled to reveal to new generations their glorious past, as a result, they try to do second to none for developing their country. On the other hand, they entail lots of information about the previous generations for instance their mistakes or approaches so new generations can use them in a way that learn from them hence they don’t repeat past generation’s mistakes. Another rationale is that these buildings are landmarks of a country and they can be an attraction site for tourists. When a country has some tourist attractions, it will generate profits for both governments and the private sector, due to that some people are keen on savoring themselves in an oasis owing to helping them to ease their stress. In conclusion, historical buildings shouldn’t be demolished and should be protected by governments and citizens should push governments to do actions for this purpose.

Generally society and governments take care of ancient buildings through low due to these architectures are unique and symbolic for the nations. in my perspective, the historical architectures should be part of our nation identity while they perhaps need some updates not to be dangerous in cities, furthermore these historical buildings are inspiring for many people, hence i think we should count on them as a symbols of our countries. secondly, most of the mentioned buildings are intrested for tourists, so in governmental side it's perfect for investing and fundraising, on the other hand it seems when we have more tourist we have better finantial cycle in those cities. In conclusion, as long as it has benefits from the historical accomodation we should take care of them and pay more attention of them.