IELTS Writing 2 Practice Test 21 Topic: Business Culture

In the present age, there has been much discussion around the issue whether strong connections between countries, in terms of economy lead to affect the countries' identities and cultures. Personally, I totally agree with that statement duo to technology and production. In the one hand, there is no doubt that if the countries increase trades between each other, it will lead to the growth of technology between countries, so in this age of modern technology and Internet, people have access to films, music, arts, languages, cultures and many other aspects of other countries that it causes to communicate with each other. For example, Appel's company takes enormous steps in technology that it brings about entering western culture to Iran and other underdeveloped states. As a result, technologies have influential effect on cultures and identities. On the other hand, it is argued that, the second reason that has a great impact on the pattern of behavior's people and individuality is production. Consequently, these products provide an opportunity to the states to learn about the cultures and lifestyles of the more developed ones and thus improve their condition. For instance, the coffee is one of the products that is located to the south of American and it has been turned into global crop that majority of people all around the world use it and I am not an exception. In conclusion, I opine that going up the business between states have a great result in cultural and identity.

In the present age, there has been much discussion around the issue whether strong connections between countries, in terms of economy lead to affect the countries' identities and cultures. Personally, I totally agree with that statement duo to technology and production. In the one hand, there is no doubt that if the countries increase trades between each other, it will lead to the growth of technology between countries, so in this age of modern technology and Internet, people have access to films, music, arts, languages, cultures and many other aspects of other countries that it causes to communicate with each other. For example, Appel's company takes enormous steps in technology that it brings about entering western culture to Iran and other underdeveloped states. As a result, technologies have influential effect on cultures and identities. On the other hand, it is argued that, the second reason that has a great impact on the pattern of behavior's people and individuality is production. Consequently, these products provide an opportunity to the states to learn about the cultures and lifestyles of the more developed ones and thus improve their condition. For instance, the coffee is one of the products that is located to the south of American and it has been turned into global crop that majority of people all around the world use it and I am not an exception. In conclusion, I opine that going up the business between states have a great result in cultural and identity.

In the present age, there has been much discussion around the issue whether strong connections between countries, in terms of economy lead to affect the countries' identities and cultures. Personally, I totally agree with that statement duo to technology and production. In the one hand, there is no doubt that if the countries increase trades between each other, it will lead to the growth of technology between countries, so in this age of modern technology and Internet, people have access to films, music, arts, languages, cultures and many other aspects of other countries that it causes to communicate with each other. For example, Appel's company takes enormous steps in technology that it brings about entering western culture to Iran and other underdeveloped states. As a result, technologies have influential effect on cultures and identities. On the other hand, it is argued that, the second reason that has a great impact on the pattern of behavior's people and individuality is production. Consequently, these products provide an opportunity to the states to learn about the cultures and lifestyles of the more developed ones and thus improve their condition. For instance, the coffee is one of the products that is located to the south of American and it has been turned into global crop that majority of people all around the world use it and I am not an exception. In conclusion, I opine that going up the business between states have a great result in cultural and identity.

It is clear that from evidence only when countries communicated with each other did they improve themselves in terms of culture and economy. Whether these relations cause the elimination of countries’ identities, is a never-ending debate. I strongly disagree with this statement, which I shall delve into in the next few paragraphs. The first point to be taken into account is that culture is a precious asset for every country that not only do the countries not allow a nation to distinguish itself from the rest of the world, but they also want to save it as a unique destination for tourists. A good illustration of this is, thousands of people want to pay a visit to Turkey or Iran just for the architecture and traditional food. On seeing this, under no circumstances should government permit this change in countries. A plethora of countries have tried to protect their cultural identities. They believe that only by saving cultural investment can they be at the top of the list of the most popular destination. Although in presiding years we have witnessed that the native people have been more accustomed to exotic cultures, so it reflects that media and business cause changes between countries. For instance, only after, countries had had interaction, did they find why they had changes in their culture. On the basis of the points mentioned above, I totally disagree with this notion that connection between countries can spoil the culture of countries, in addition, I am inclined to believe that, countries try to keep their culture owing to the fact that it is the most important feature for them.

Regarding the effect or lack of effect of export and import on the culture and identity of the country, I must say that I agree with the first one, in the rest of the article I will explain the reasons.First, I believe that the products imported into the country can have a significant impact on the country's culture, because the products produced in each country are made in accordance with the culture and identity of that country, and the import of products from other countries can indirectly affect the importing country.Secondly, the prosperity of trade and the reduction of poverty or the decline of trade and the increase of poverty can also have a significant impact on the culture of a society, because poverty destroys the culture and identity of a country and causes heavy damage to it. People can influence the culture and identity of a country.To conclude, we can say that considering that trade can be the currency of a country and affect the financial situation of people, then trade has an effect on the culture and identity of a country.

Regarding the effect or lack of effect of export and import on the culture and identity of the country, I must say that I agree with the first one, in the rest of the article I will explain the reasons.First, I believe that the products imported into the country can have a significant impact on the country's culture, because the products produced in each country are made in accordance with the culture and identity of that country, and the import of products from other countries can indirectly affect the importing country.Secondly, the prosperity of trade and the reduction of poverty or the decline of trade and the increase of poverty can also have a significant impact on the culture of a society, because poverty destroys the culture and identity of a country and causes heavy damage to it. People can influence the culture and identity of a country.To conclude, we can say that considering that trade can be the currency of a country and affect the financial situation of people, then trade has an effect on the culture and identity of a country.

one of the entirely obvious features of the 21st century is the cultural and economic ties between nations. To tell you more specifically, nowadays increased business between countries and the power of media has a great impact on the countries culture. Therefor many fear that this may lade to the extinction of national identity. I firmly believe and don’t agree with this statement. In the next few paragraphs, I will explain my point of view in detail. In the process of becoming more connected to the outside world, nations are not necessarily ignoring their precious asset that is their culture . In addition to allowing nations to stand out from the rest of the world, indigenous cultures also play many other important roles, such as: attracting foreign tourists, developing the tourism industry, creating high profits. One reason is that for many tourists, a country's cultural and historical context is one of the most important criteria when choosing a destination. For example thousands of people want to visit Iran and Italy because of Iranian unique foods culture and the beautiful architecture of Italian church. In many countries the native people have become accustomed to integration of foreign cultures. To tell you more specifically, It reflects the combined effects of the integration of foreign cultures, both through media and direct business interaction. On the other hand, this has reduced racist thoughts towards different ethnicities. For example, over time, by merging foreign cultures accompanied by the original cultures of each country we will create a newer fusion bot. Finally, I am confident that exchanges between countries will deepen in the fields of economy and culture can eliminate racism while strengthening the identity of the nations involved.

surely Increase business between the countries It causes economic growth. It is according to data global bank in 2020. International Business cause is increase income between the folks. Because in global business we have bigger marker for sell the our products but naturally business with strang folks change the Coulter. But it's not bad. Because President Roosevelt says development needs to price and the cost of it is forget and change something in Culture. Except this case adolescent like the development and day ready for pay any cost especially their Culture. Because they are greedy for new things as well as other things it needs to other country and trade with them. In short, I have got to add connection with different people it's necessary for development . And we have come this far and we must continue this way at any cost. And Cultural changes are not bad. It's just cost for growth the countrie and people.